Answer this in easy form,Compare rule by law,and,rule of law,why might authoritarian state prefer,rule by law,even though both use legal code.

Here's a comparison of "rule by law" and "rule of law": Rule of Law: This principle means that everyone*, including the government and its officials, is accountable to the law. The law is supreme, applied equally, and protects fundamental rights, ensuring fairness and justice. Rule by Law: In this system, the government uses the law as a tool to maintain order and control the population. While there are laws, the government itself is often above these laws or can change them arbitrarily to suit its interests, rather than being bound by them. An authoritarian state might prefer rule by law because it allows them to use legal codes to legitimize their power and actions, suppress dissent, and control citizens, all while appearing to operate within a legal framework. This approach provides the appearance of order and legality without the government having to submit to the same legal constraints or protect individual rights, which would limit its absolute power. That's 2 down. 3 left today — send the next one.