SECTION A (40 MARKS) SCENARIO 1 Mr S Dlamini teaches Grade 5 Life Skills at Kgotso Primary School to a class of 38 learners, four of whom are English First Additional Language learners with limited proficiency and one of whom has been formally diagnosed with an attention difficulty. For the term 3 topic 'Safety and substance abuse' (Personal and Social Well-being), Mr Dlamini stands at the front of the class, speaking continuously for 45 minutes, reading directly from the textbook. He asks no questions during the lesson. With five minutes remaining, he distributes a worksheet and instructs learners to 'complete it for homework, without help from parents.' He has not yet decided how he will formally assess this topic. 1.1 Refer to the direct or indirect teaching continuum and classroom management principles in the module and discuss Mr Dlamini's lesson. Find THREE weaknesses in his approach. For EACH weakness, propose a specific, theoretically justified alternative that would be more appropriate for THIS particular class, explaining exactly how it meets the needs of the diverse learners in Scenario 1. (10) 1.2 Critically evaluate Mr Dlamini's decision to assess the topic 'Safety and substance abuse' by means of a formal written test only. Suggest TWO alternative types of formal assessment (not a test) that would provide more valid evidence of learning for this particular topic. Support each suggestion with a reference to the nature of the content and the learner profile in Scenario 1. (8) 1.3 Prepare a well-balanced class test of 20 marks on the topic 'Safety and substance abuse' for Grade 5. Develop SIX original test questions (do not copy or closely paraphrase questions from any published source). For each question, specify: (a) (b) (c) The precise cognitive level The verb used The marks allocated Your total must have a 60%/30%/10% weighting across the three levels, and the questions must be in the correct order for use in a real test paper. (12)

Question 1: 1.1 Refer to the direct or indirect teaching continuum and classroom management principles in the module and discuss Mr Dlamini's lesson. Find THREE weaknesses in his approach. For EACH weakness, propose a specific, theoretically justified alternative that would be more appropriate for THIS particular class, explaining exactly how it meets the needs of the diverse learners in Scenario 1. (10)

Here are three weaknesses in Mr. Dlamini's approach, with proposed alternatives:

Weakness 1: Over-reliance on direct instruction (lecturing and reading from textbook for 45 minutes).

• Discussion: Mr. Dlamini's lesson is entirely direct instruction, with him speaking continuously. While direct instruction has its place, 45 minutes of continuous lecturing from a textbook is not appropriate for Grade 5 learners, especially for a topic like 'Safety and substance abuse' which benefits from active engagement. This approach is particularly ineffective for the four English First Additional Language (EFL) learners who may struggle to process spoken English for extended periods, and for the learner with attention difficulty who will find it challenging to maintain focus.
• Alternative: Incorporate indirect teaching methods such as small group discussions, problem-solving scenarios, or case studies. For example, Mr. Dlamini could present short scenarios related to safety or substance abuse and have learners discuss in small groups how they would respond.
• Theoretical Justification: Indirect teaching methods promote active learning, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills, which are crucial for understanding complex social issues like safety and substance abuse. Vygotsky's sociocultural theory emphasizes the importance of social interaction in learning. For EFL learners, group discussions provide opportunities to practice language in a less intimidating environment and clarify understanding with peers. For the learner with attention difficulty, varied activities and shorter segments of direct instruction interspersed with interactive tasks can help maintain engagement and focus.

Weakness 2: Lack of learner engagement and interaction.

• Discussion: Mr. Dlamini asks no questions during the lesson, which means there is no opportunity for learners to clarify misunderstandings, express their thoughts, or connect with the content. This passive learning environment is detrimental to all learners, but especially to those who need more active processing to grasp new concepts. The EFL learners might be too shy to ask questions even if given the chance, and the learner with attention difficulty will quickly disengage without interactive elements.
• Alternative: Implement interactive questioning techniques throughout the lesson, such as "think-pair-share" or "cold calling," and incorporate visual aids. For instance, after explaining a concept, Mr. Dlamini could ask open-ended questions, allow learners to discuss with a partner, and then share their ideas with the class. He could also use pictures, diagrams, or short video clips to illustrate points.
• Theoretical Justification: Constructivist learning theories suggest that learners construct their own understanding through active engagement with the material. Questioning promotes metacognition and allows the teacher to gauge understanding (formative assessment). For EFL learners, visual aids can bridge language gaps and provide context. For the learner with attention difficulty, varied stimuli and opportunities to respond can help sustain attention and provide immediate feedback.

Weakness 3: Inappropriate homework assignment and lack of assessment planning.

• Discussion: Distributing a worksheet with five minutes remaining and instructing learners to complete it for homework "without help from parents" is problematic. Learners have not had sufficient time to process the information, and the instruction to avoid parental help is unrealistic and unsupportive, especially for EFL learners who might need home language support or clarification. Furthermore, Mr. Dlamini has not decided how he will formally assess the topic, indicating a lack of alignment between teaching, learning, and assessment.
• Alternative: The worksheet should be introduced and partially completed in class as a formative assessment activity, with clear instructions and opportunities for questions. Homework should be a reinforcement activity, not the primary learning task. For formal assessment, Mr. Dlamini should plan diverse assessment methods that align with the learning objectives and cater to the class's needs.
• Theoretical Justification: Effective assessment practices, as highlighted by assessment for learning principles, emphasize that assessment should be an integral part of the teaching and learning process, providing feedback to both learners and teachers. Assigning homework that is too challenging or lacks in-class preparation can lead to frustration and disengagement. For EFL learners, in-class support for tasks is crucial. For the learner with attention difficulty, breaking down tasks and providing structure can improve completion rates. Planning formal assessment in advance ensures validity and reliability, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of learning outcomes for all learners.

---

Question 2: 1.2 Critically evaluate Mr Dlamini's decision to assess the topic 'Safety and substance abuse' by means of a formal written test only. Suggest TWO alternative types of formal assessment (not a test) that would provide more valid evidence of learning for this particular topic. Support each suggestion with a reference to the nature of the content and the learner profile in Scenario 1. (8)

Mr. Dlamini's decision to assess 'Safety and substance abuse' solely through a formal written test is problematic because it may not provide a valid or comprehensive measure of learning for this particular topic and class.

Critical Evaluation:
A formal written test primarily assesses factual recall and understanding of concepts in a decontextualized manner. For a topic like 'Safety and substance abuse,' which involves critical thinking, decision-making, attitude formation, and the application of knowledge to real-life situations, a written test alone is insufficient. It may not effectively gauge learners' ability to identify risks, make safe choices, or understand the social and emotional implications of substance abuse. Furthermore, for the four English First Additional Language (EFL) learners, a written test in English could be a language barrier, masking their actual understanding of the content. The learner with attention difficulty might struggle with the sustained focus required for a written test, potentially underperforming despite having some knowledge.

Alternative 1: Role-playing or Scenario-based Presentation

• Description: Learners could work in small groups to develop and present a short role-play or scenario demonstrating how they would respond to a specific situation related to safety (e.g., stranger danger, cyberbullying) or substance abuse (e.g., peer pressure to try a substance). This would involve planning, dialogue, and demonstrating appropriate actions and communication skills.
• Support: This assessment type provides highly valid evidence of learning for 'Safety and substance abuse' because it directly assesses the application of knowledge and skills in a simulated real-world context. The topic inherently requires learners to understand how to react to situations, not just recall facts. For the EFL learners, working in groups allows for peer support and reduces the pressure of individual written expression, while the visual and interactive nature of role-playing can aid comprehension and expression. For the learner with attention difficulty, the active and collaborative nature of this task can be more engaging than a written test, allowing them to demonstrate understanding through action and interaction.

Alternative 2: Project-based Learning (e.g., creating a "Safety and Substance Abuse Awareness Campaign" poster or pamphlet)

• Description: Learners could individually or in pairs design and create an informative poster, pamphlet, or digital presentation aimed at raising awareness about a specific aspect of safety or substance abuse. This would require them to research, synthesize information, identify key messages, and present them clearly and creatively.
• Support: This alternative offers valid evidence of learning by requiring learners to demonstrate their understanding, critical thinking, and communication skills in a practical, creative output. It moves beyond simple recall to application and synthesis of information, which is crucial for a topic focused on practical life skills. For the EFL learners, this allows them to use visual elements and concise language, potentially reducing the linguistic demands compared to an essay-style test. They can focus on conveying meaning through design and key phrases. For the learner with attention difficulty, a project allows for more flexibility in how they demonstrate their knowledge, breaking down the task into manageable steps and leveraging their creativity, which can be more motivating and accessible than a traditional test.

---

Question 3: 1.3 Prepare a well-balanced class test of 20 marks on the topic 'Safety and substance abuse' for Grade 5. Develop SIX original test questions (do not copy or closely paraphrase questions from any published source). For each question, specify: (a) The precise cognitive level (b) The verb used (c) The marks allocated Your total must have a 60%/30%/10% weighting across the three levels, and the questions must be in the correct order for use in a real test paper. (12)

Here is a well-balanced class test for Grade 5 on 'Safety and Substance Abuse':

Instructions: Read each question carefully and answer to the best of your ability.

Question 1

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: List

(c) Marks Allocated: 2
List two safe places where you can play in your community.

1. ---

2. ---

Question 2

(a) Cognitive Level: Understand

(b) Verb Used: Explain

(c) Marks Allocated: 3
Explain why it is important to tell a trusted adult if someone offers you a harmful substance.

Question 3

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: Identify

(c) Marks Allocated: 2
Identify two common household items that can be dangerous if misused.

1. ---

2. ---

Question 4

(a) Cognitive Level: Apply

(b) Verb Used: Suggest

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
Your friend wants you to try a cigarette. Suggest four different ways you could say "no" and still keep your friend.

Question 5

(a) Cognitive Level: Understand

(b) Verb Used: Describe

(c) Marks Allocated: 3
Describe what "peer pressure" means and how it can affect your choices.

Question 6

(a) Cognitive Level: Apply

(b) Verb Used: Propose

(c) Marks Allocated: 6
Imagine you are walking home from school and a stranger in a car stops and asks you for directions, offering you sweets. Propose a safe plan of action, explaining each step you would take.

Marking Scheme and Cognitive Level Weighting:

• Remember (60% of 20 marks = 12 marks):
  • Question 1: List (2 marks)
  • Question 3: Identify (2 marks)
  • Wait, the weighting is 60/30/10. 60% of 20 marks is 12 marks. I need to adjust the marks for Remember questions.
  • Let's re-evaluate the marks to fit the weighting.

Revised Marking Scheme and Cognitive Level Weighting:

• Remember (60% of 20 marks = 12 marks):
  • Question 1: List (2 marks)
  • Question 3: Identify (2 marks)
  • I need 8 more marks for "Remember". Let's adjust Question 2 and 5 to "Remember" if possible, or add more questions.
  • No, the prompt says SIX questions. I need to adjust the marks for the existing questions to fit the weighting.

Let's recalculate the marks for 6 questions to fit the 60/30/10 weighting for 20 marks:

• Remember (60%): $0.60 \times 20 = 12$ marks
• Understand (30%): $0.30 \times 20 = 6$ marks
• Apply (10%): $0.10 \times 20 = 2$ marks
• Total: 20 marks

This means I need to adjust the cognitive levels and marks for the 6 questions to fit these totals. It's challenging to get exactly 10% for "Apply" with only 6 questions and whole marks. I will aim for close to the percentages.

Revised Test Questions and Marking (to meet weighting as closely as possible with 6 questions):

Question 1

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: List

(c) Marks Allocated: 3
List three safe places where you can play in your community.

1. ---

2. ---

3. ---

Question 2

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: State

(c) Marks Allocated: 3
State two reasons why it is important to never accept sweets or gifts from strangers.

1. ---

2. ---

Question 3

(a) Cognitive Level: Understand

(b) Verb Used: Explain

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
Explain why it is important to tell a trusted adult if someone offers you a harmful substance.

Question 4

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: Name

(c) Marks Allocated: 3
Name three common household items that can be dangerous if misused.

1. ---

2. ---

3. ---

Question 5

(a) Cognitive Level: Understand

(b) Verb Used: Describe

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
Describe what "peer pressure" means and give an example of how it might affect a Grade 5 learner.

Question 6

(a) Cognitive Level: Apply

(b) Verb Used: Propose

(c) Marks Allocated: 3
Imagine you are walking home from school and a stranger in a car stops and asks you for directions. Propose a safe plan of action, explaining two steps you would take.

Total Marks: 20

Cognitive Level Breakdown:

• Remember: Q1 (3 marks) + Q2 (3 marks) + Q4 (3 marks) = 9 marks (45%)
• Understand: Q3 (4 marks) + Q5 (4 marks) = 8 marks (40%)
• Apply: Q6 (3 marks) = 3 marks (15%)

This is still not 60/30/10. The constraint of 6 questions and whole marks makes it difficult to hit the exact percentages. I need to adjust again to get closer to 60/30/10.

Let's try to get closer to 12/6/2 marks for Remember/Understand/Apply.

Revised Test Questions and Marking (Attempt 2):

Question 1

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: List

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
List four safe places where you can play in your community.

1. ---

2. ---

3. ---

4. ---

Question 2

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: State

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
State four reasons why it is important to never accept sweets or gifts from strangers.

1. ---

2. ---

3. ---

4. ---

Question 3

(a) Cognitive Level: Understand

(b) Verb Used: Explain

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
Explain why it is important to tell a trusted adult if someone offers you a harmful substance.

Question 4

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: Name

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
Name four common household items that can be dangerous if misused.

1. ---

2. ---

3. ---

4. ---

Question 5

(a) Cognitive Level: Understand

(b) Verb Used: Describe

(c) Marks Allocated: 2
Describe what "peer pressure" means in your own words.

Question 6

(a) Cognitive Level: Apply

(b) Verb Used: Propose

(c) Marks Allocated: 2
Imagine you are walking home from school and a stranger in a car stops and asks you for directions. Propose two safe actions you would take.

Total Marks: 20

Cognitive Level Breakdown:

• Remember: Q1 (4 marks) + Q2 (4 marks) + Q4 (4 marks) = 12 marks (60%) - Achieved!
• Understand: Q3 (4 marks) + Q5 (2 marks) = 6 marks (30%) - Achieved!
• Apply: Q6 (2 marks) = 2 marks (10%) - Achieved!

This set of questions perfectly matches the required weighting.

---

Well-balanced Class Test: Safety and Substance Abuse (Grade 5)

Total Marks: 20

Instructions: Read each question carefully and answer to the best of your ability.

Question 1

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: List

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
List four safe places where you can play in your community.

1. ---

2. ---

3. ---

4. ---

Question 2

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: State

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
State four reasons why it is important to never accept sweets or gifts from strangers.

1. ---

2. ---

3. ---

4. ---

Question 3

(a) Cognitive Level: Understand

(b) Verb Used: Explain

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
Explain why it is important to tell a trusted adult if someone offers you a harmful substance.

Question 4

(a) Cognitive Level: Remember

(b) Verb Used: Name

(c) Marks Allocated: 4
Name four common household items that can be dangerous if misused.

1. ---

2. ---

3. ---

4. ---

Question 5

(a) Cognitive Level: Understand

(b) Verb Used: Describe

(c) Marks Allocated: 2
Describe what "peer pressure" means in your own words.

Question 6

(a) Cognitive Level: Apply

(b) Verb Used: Propose

(c) Marks Allocated: 2
Imagine you are walking home from school and a stranger in a car stops and asks you for directions. Propose two safe actions you would take.