Give me points for the debate that says as ordinary citizens there is little we can do about climate change

Here are some points for the debate position that ordinary citizens have little impact on climate change:

• Systemic vs. Individual Responsibility: The vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions come from large-scale industrial activities, energy production, agriculture, and transportation infrastructure, which are controlled by corporations and governments, not individual choices. Focusing on individual actions can distract from the need for systemic change.
• Lack of Political and Economic Power: Ordinary citizens often lack the direct political power or financial leverage to influence the major polluters or enact the large-scale policy changes (e.g., carbon taxes, renewable energy mandates, international agreements) that are necessary to address climate change effectively.
• Economic Constraints and Accessibility: Many "green" choices (e.g., electric vehicles, solar panels, organic food) are more expensive or less accessible, making them impractical or impossible for a significant portion of the population, especially those with lower incomes.
• Scale of the Problem: While individual actions are commendable, their cumulative impact is often dwarfed by the sheer scale of global emissions. Even if every individual adopted highly sustainable practices, without corresponding large-scale shifts in industry and policy, the overall impact on global warming would be limited.
• "Greenwashing" and Misdirection: Corporations and governments sometimes promote individual responsibility as a way to deflect blame from their own larger contributions and avoid implementing more costly or politically challenging systemic solutions.