Here are the proofs using the Principle of Mathematical Induction.
3. Prove that ∑k=1n(2k−1)2=31n(4n2−1), ∀n≥1.
-
Step 1: Base Case (n=1)
For n=1, the LHS is ∑k=11(2k−1)2=(2(1)−1)2=12=1.
The RHS is 31(1)(4(1)2−1)=31(1)(4−1)=31(3)=1.
Since LHS = RHS, the statement is true for n=1.
-
Step 2: Inductive Hypothesis
Assume that the statement is true for some integer k≥1.
That is, assume ∑i=1k(2i−1)2=31k(4k2−1).
-
Step 3: Inductive Step (n=k+1)
We need to prove that the statement is true for n=k+1:
∑i=1k+1(2i−1)2=31(k+1)(4(k+1)2−1)
Consider the LHS:
∑i=1k+1(2i−1)2=(∑i=1k(2i−1)2)+(2(k+1)−1)2
Using the inductive hypothesis, we substitute ∑i=1k(2i−1)2=31k(4k2−1):
=31k(4k2−1)+(2k+2−1)2
=31k(4k2−1)+(2k+1)2
Factor 4k2−1 as (2k−1)(2k+1):
=31k(2k−1)(2k+1)+(2k+1)2
Factor out (2k+1):
=(2k+1)[3k(2k−1)+(2k+1)]
=(2k+1)[32k2−k+3(2k+1)]
=(2k+1)[32k2−k+6k+3]
=(2k+1)[32k2+5k+3]
Factor the quadratic 2k2+5k+3:
2k2+5k+3=2k2+2k+3k+3=2k(k+1)+3(k+1)=(2k+3)(k+1)
Substitute this back into the expression:
=(2k+1)3(k+1)(2k+3)
=31(k+1)(2k+1)(2k+3)
Now, let's expand the RHS we want to achieve:
31(k+1)(4(k+1)2−1)=31(k+1)(4(k2+2k+1)−1)
=31(k+1)(4k2+8k+4−1)
=31(k+1)(4k2+8k+3)
Factor the quadratic 4k2+8k+3:
4k2+8k+3=4k2+2k+6k+3=2k(2k+1)+3(2k+1)=(2k+1)(2k+3)
So, the RHS is:
=31(k+1)(2k+1)(2k+3)
Since LHS = RHS, the statement is true for n=k+1.
By the Principle of Mathematical Induction, the statement ∑k=1n(2k−1)2=31n(4n2−1) is true for all integers n≥1.
4. Prove that n3−n is divisible by 6 for all n≥1.
-
Step 1: Base Case (n=1)
For n=1, 13−1=1−1=0.
Since 0 is divisible by 6 (0=6×0), the statement is true for n=1.
-
Step 2: Inductive Hypothesis
Assume that the statement is true for some integer k≥1.
That is, assume k3−k is divisible by 6.
This means k3−k=6m for some integer m.
-
Step 3: Inductive Step (n=k+1)
We need to prove that (k+1)3−(k+1) is divisible by 6.
Consider the expression:
(k+1)3−(k+1)
Expand (k+1)3:
=(k3+3k2+3k+1)−(k+1)
=k3+3k2+3k+1−k−1
Rearrange the terms to use the inductive hypothesis:
=(k3−k)+3k2+3k
=(k3−k)+3k(k+1)
By the inductive hypothesis, k3−k is divisible by 6. So, we can write k3−k=6m for some integer m.
Now consider the term 3k(k+1).
The product of two consecutive integers, k(k+1), is always an even number. This is because either k is even or k+1 is even.
Therefore, k(k+1)=2p for some integer p.
Substitute this into 3k(k+1):
3k(k+1)=3(2p)=6p
So, 3k(k+1) is also divisible by 6.
Now substitute these back into the expression for (k+1)3−(k+1):
(k+1)3−(k+1)=(k3−k)+3k(k+1)
=6m+6p
=6(m+p)
Since m and p are integers, their sum m+p is also an integer.
Thus, (k+1)3−(k+1) is a multiple of 6, which means it is divisible by 6.
By the Principle of Mathematical Induction, the statement n3−n is divisible by 6 is true for all integers n≥1.