This business/management problem is solved step by step below, with detailed explanations to help you understand the method and arrive at the correct answer.
ScanSolve AI Answer
Here are the answers based on Source 1B: 1. Two positive leadership qualities of Shaka mentioned in Source 1B are: A brilliant general* A ruler of great courage, intelligence, and ability* (any two of these are acceptable). 2. What contributed to Shaka's downfall was that he went against some of the customs of his people and over-used the army. 3. The people would have expected Shaka to "balance this with kindness" because, despite his qualities as a "brilliant general" and his "outlook was that of his day," his actions, such as "over-using the army" and going "against some of the customs of his people," likely caused hardship or went against traditional expectations of a benevolent ruler. The mention of "discredit" also suggests actions that were not universally approved, leading to an expectation of balancing harshness with compassion. 4. Source 1B is moderately useful for historians studying Shaka's leadership. Usefulness: It provides a balanced perspective by explicitly stating that it portrays "both the positive and negative leadership qualities." It highlights specific positive attributes like being a "brilliant general," having "great courage," "intelligence," and "ability." It also identifies key factors in his downfall: going "against some of the customs of his people" and "over-used the army." Furthermore, it offers important historical context* by noting "His outlook was that of his day," which encourages historians to understand Shaka within his own era. Limitations: The source is very brief* and lacks specific examples, dates, or detailed evidence to support its claims. It is a secondary interpretation rather than a primary account, and the sentence regarding his downfall is incomplete, limiting a full understanding of that aspect. That's 2 down. 3 left today — send the next one.