Here are explanations for the factors listed as alibis for military intervention in most African countries: a)* Bad Leadership cum Governance: Poor leadership, characterized by authoritarianism, lack of accountability, and disregard for democratic principles, often creates a power vacuum or a crisis of legitimacy. When civilian governments fail to provide effective governance, deliver public services, or uphold the rule of law, the military frequently cites these failures as a justification to intervene and "restore order" or "save the nation." b)* Corruption: Widespread corruption within civilian governments, including embezzlement of public funds, illicit enrichment, and cronyism, erodes public trust and cripples state institutions. This systemic corruption often leads to popular discontent and protests, which the military can exploit as a pretext for a coup, presenting themselves as saviors who will cleanse the political system and fight graft. c)* Insecurity: Rising levels of insecurity, such as ethnic conflicts, insurgencies, terrorism, or widespread violent crime, are often attributed to the civilian government's inability to maintain law and order. The military can then intervene, claiming it is necessary to protect national sovereignty, restore peace, and ensure the safety of citizens, thereby positioning itself as the only institution capable of guaranteeing stability. d)* Economic hardship and stagnation: Severe economic crises, including high unemployment, rampant inflation, poverty, and a lack of development, lead to widespread public frustration and social unrest. When civilian governments are perceived as failing to address these economic challenges, the military often steps in, promising to revive the economy, alleviate suffering, and bring prosperity, using the economic woes as a primary justification for seizing power. That's 2 down. 3 left today — send the next one.