The J.C. Shah Commission recommended the inclusion of Chandigarh and Kharar tehsil into Haryana based on the 1961 linguistic census. Is this statement true, and is the reason given correct?

here's the analysis of the assertion and reason:

• Assertion A: "The J.C. Shah Commission, established in 1966, unanimously recommended the inclusion of Chandigarh and Kharar tehsil into the newly formed state of Haryana." This statement is true. The Shah Commission was formed to demarcate the boundaries between Punjab and Haryana. It recommended that Chandigarh, along with the Hindi-speaking areas of Kharar tehsil, should be merged with Haryana based on linguistic considerations.

• Reason R: "The 1961 linguistic census indicated a decisive Hindi-speaking majority in both Chandigarh and the Kharar tehsil." This statement is also true. The Shah Commission's recommendations were primarily based on the 1961 census data, which showed a Hindi-speaking majority in Chandigarh and the surrounding Kharar tehsil.

• Relationship between A and R: Reason R provides the direct basis for the recommendation made in Assertion A. The Shah Commission recommended the inclusion of these areas into Haryana because the 1961 linguistic census indicated a Hindi-speaking majority there. Therefore, R is the correct explanation of A.

The correct option is (A).

A) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
One more to go! Send it over.