In S v Makwanyane and Another 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC), the Constitutional Court found that the death penalty, provided for in section 277 of the Criminal Procedure Act, was per se unconstitutional. I

April 24, 2026Law

ScanSolve AI Answer

April 24, 2026

Answer

per se

In S v Makwanyane and Another 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC), the Constitutional Court found that the death penalty, provided for in section 277 of the Criminal Procedure Act, was per se unconstitutional. It therefore declared section 277(1) invalid.

$\boxed{per se}$

3 done, 2 left today. You're making progress.

Was this helpful?

Need help with your own homework?

Get instant step-by-step solutions to any question. Free to start.

Ask Your Question

Handwritten Step-by-Step Solution

Get this as a handwritten image on WhatsApp — like a tutor wrote it for you.

Try on WhatsApp

More Law Questions

QExamination malpractice way to stop it QDiscuss 5 principles, 3 investigative techniques, 2 attribute of an investigator, and 2 investigativ…QGive out 10 challenges facing East African Legislative Assembly, suggest the possible solutions to t…QWrite down any five key position in political party QMention five human rights in Nigeria

See all Law questions →

Still have questions?

Quick Answer

In S v Makwanyane and Another 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC), the Constitutional Court found that the death penalty, provided for in section 277 of the Criminal Procedure Act, was per se unconstitutional.

Asked on April 24, 2026Law

This law problem is solved step by step below, with detailed explanations to help you understand the method and arrive at the correct answer.

ScanSolve AI AnswerAnswered on April 24, 2026

In S v Makwanyane and Another 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC), the Constitutional Court found that the death penalty, provided for in section 277 of the Criminal Procedure Act, was per se unconstitutional. It therefore declared section 277(1) invalid. per se 3 done, 2 left today. You're making progress.