Construct truth table method whether or contra dictary it contingency, tautology Po(~po~2)

Mathematics

ScanSolve AI Answer

Step-by-step solution

5 steps

To determine if the statement P∨(∼P∧∼Q)P \lor (\sim P \land \sim Q) is a tautology, contradiction, or contingency, we construct a truth table.

  1. List all possible truth values for the atomic propositions PP and QQ.

    PPQQ
    TT
    TF
    FT
    FF
  2. Calculate the truth values for the negations ∼P\sim P and ∼Q\sim Q.

    PPQQ∼P\sim P∼Q\sim Q
    TTFF
    TFFT
    FTTF
    FFTT
  3. Calculate the truth values for the conjunction ∼P∧∼Q\sim P \land \sim Q.

    This is true only when both ∼P\sim P and ∼Q\sim Q are true.

    PPQQ∼P\sim P∼Q\sim Q∼P∧∼Q\sim P \land \sim Q
    TTFFF
    TFFTF
    FTTFF
    FFTTT
  4. Calculate the truth values for the main expression P∨(∼P∧∼Q)P \lor (\sim P \land \sim Q).

    This is true if PP is true, or if (∼P∧∼Q)(\sim P \land \sim Q) is true, or both.

    PPQQ∼P\sim P∼Q\sim Q∼P∧∼Q\sim P \land \sim QP∨(∼P∧∼Q)P \lor (\sim P \land \sim Q)
    TTFFFT ∨\lor F = T
    TFFTFT ∨\lor F = T
    FTTFFF ∨\lor F = F
    FFTTTF ∨\lor T = T
  5. Analyze the final column.

    The final column for P∨(∼P∧∼Q)P \lor (\sim P \land \sim Q) contains both 'T' (True) and 'F' (False) values.

    • If all values were 'T', it would be a tautology.
    • If all values were 'F', it would be a contradiction.
    • Since it contains a mix of 'T' and 'F', it is a contingency.

    The statement P∨(∼P∧∼Q)P \lor (\sim P \land \sim Q) is a contingency.

Was this helpful?

Still stuck on this one?

Ask a follow-up, and the answer starts from this question.

Got a different question?Ask your own question