We read your photo as:

Why is 28 square units not a possible area for a rectangle with a width of 3 units?

Mathematics

ScanSolve AI Answer

Step-by-step solution

3 steps
  1. Recall the formula for the area of a rectangle, which is given by

    Area=length×width\text{Area} = \text{length} \times \text{width}

    We are given that the area is 28 square units and the width is 3 units.

  2. Substitute the given values into the formula to find the length

    28=length×328 = \text{length} \times 3

    To find the length, divide the area by the width:

    length=283\text{length} = \frac{28}{3} length=913 units\text{length} = 9\frac{1}{3} \text{ units}
  3. Explain why this is not a "possible" area.

    The length of the rectangle would be 9139\frac{1}{3} units. In many elementary contexts, when discussing areas in "square units," it is implied that the side lengths are whole numbers. Since 9139\frac{1}{3} is not a whole number, it means that a rectangle with a width of 3 units cannot have an area of exactly 28 square units if we are restricted to whole number lengths.

    The area of 28 square units is not possible for a rectangle with a width of 3 units because the required length, 283\frac{28}{3} units, is not a whole number.

Was this helpful?

Still stuck on this one?

Ask a follow-up, and the answer starts from this question.

Got a different question?Ask your own question
Handwritten step-by-step solution preview

Handwritten Step-by-Step Solution

Get this as a handwritten image on WhatsApp — like a tutor wrote it for you.

Try on WhatsApp