Discuss the negative impacts of high-stakes language testing and propose alternative assessment strategies.

High-stakes language testing, while powerful, comes with significant costs. It often leads to negative washback, where teaching and learning become narrowly focused on test content, neglecting broader language skills and communicative competence. In terms of equity, such tests can disadvantage certain student populations due to cultural bias, socioeconomic factors, or lack of access to test preparation resources. This can also compromise teaching quality by encouraging "teaching to the test" rather than fostering deep understanding and holistic language development. To create a fairer, more valid, and educationally sound language assessment system, aptitude testing can be used to identify potential and inform instructional strategies, rather than for high-stakes decisions. Low-stakes assessment, such as quizzes, portfolios, and classroom observations, provides ongoing feedback, reduces pressure, and allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of learning progress. Crucially, strong curriculum alignment ensures that assessments accurately reflect the learning objectives and content taught, enhancing validity. By integrating these elements, a system can be developed that supports learning, provides meaningful data, and mitigates the negative impacts of relying solely on high-stakes measures. That's 2 down. 3 left today — send the next one.