Children have fundamental rights, they may be restricted but only when necessary and proportionate. The restriction of children’s rights “for their own safety” comes as an odd risk mitigation measure, when there is so much room to improve online safety prior to resorting to exclusion (for instance, see the upcoming DFA and the Art. 28 DSA Guidelines – except for their age-verification elements). what does it means and dont add big words
Law
ScanSolve AI Answer
Answer
The text means that children have basic rights, and these rights should only be limited if it's absolutely necessary and fair.
It suggests that stopping children from using online services "for their own safety" is a strange way to protect them. Instead, the focus should be on making the internet safer first, before blocking children from using it. It mentions new rules (like DFA and DSA guidelines) that aim to improve online safety, but notes that parts of these rules that check age might be an exception to this idea.
Was this helpful?
Still stuck on this one?
Ask a follow-up, and the answer starts from this question.
Got a different question?Ask your own question
More Law Questions
QState two rights of a child in the constitutionQACTIVITY 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Cyber bullying is the use of digital technology, such as social media…QWhy should we use cyber safety rules?QThe right of children mentioned in the first stanza is the right to live a life without fright, to…QWhat are the effects of limiting freedom of expression in cyberspace for learners, and what…