We read your photo as:

List four methods used to reduce leakage flux. 2. Calculate the transformation ratio for a 30 kVA, 2200 V / 250 V transformer. 3. Calculate the full-load secondary current.

Physics

ScanSolve AI Answer

This answer stops before the end.

It was cut off when it was first written. Ask ScanSolve this question again for the full working.

Step 1: List FOUR methods used to reduce leakage flux (3.1)
Four methods used to reduce leakage flux in a transformer are:

  • Interleaving windings: Winding primary and secondary coils in sections and placing them alternately to ensure closer magnetic coupling.
  • Concentric windings: Placing one winding (e.g., the low voltage winding) inside the other (e.g., the high voltage winding) to reduce the distance between them and improve coupling.
  • Shell-type core construction: This construction provides a double magnetic path, which inherently reduces leakage flux compared to core-type transformers.
  • Reducing the length of the mean turn: By designing the core window to be smaller, the average length of the magnetic path for the windings is reduced, which helps in reducing leakage flux.

Step 2: Calculate the transformation ratio (3.2)
Given:
Transformer rating S=30 kVAS = 30 \text{ kVA}
Primary voltage V1=2200 VV_1 = 2200 \text{ V}
Secondary voltage V2=250 VV_2 = 250 \text{ V} (rated no-load)

The transformation ratio aa is:

a=V1V2=2200 V250 V=8.8a = \frac{V_1}{V_2} = \frac{2200 \text{ V}}{250 \text{ V}} = 8.8

Step 3: Calculate the full-load secondary current
The full-load secondary current I2,FLI_{2, \text{FL}} is calculated from the transformer rating:

S=V2I2,FLS = V_2 I_{2, \text{FL}} 30×103 VA=250 V×I2,FL30 \times 10^3 \text{ VA} = 250 \text{ V} \times I_{2, \text{FL}} I2,FL=30000 VA250 V=120 AI_{2, \text{FL}} = \frac{30000 \text{ VA}}{250 \text{ V}} = 120 \text{ A}

Step 4: Calculate the equivalent resistance and reactance referred to the secondary side
Primary winding: R1=1.3ΩR_1 = 1.3 \Omega, X1=4.6ΩX_1 = 4.6 \Omega
Secondary winding: R2=0.2ΩR_2 = 0.2 \Omega, X2=0.4ΩX_2 = 0.4 \Omega

Equivalent resistance referred to the secondary side (Req2R_{eq2}):

Req2=R2+R1a2R_{eq2} = R_2 + \frac{R_1}{a^2} Req2=0.2Ω+1.3Ω(8.8)2R_{eq2} = 0.2 \Omega + \frac{1.3 \Omega}{(8.8)^2} Req2=0.2Ω+1.3Ω77.44R_{eq2} = 0.2 \Omega + \frac{1.3 \Omega}{77.44} Req2≈0.2Ω+0.016787Ω≈0.2168ΩR_{eq2} \approx 0.2 \Omega + 0.016787 \Omega \approx 0.2168 \Omega

Equivalent reactance referred to the secondary side (Xeq2X_{eq2}):

Xeq2=X2+X1a2X_{eq2} = X_2 + \frac{X_1}{a^2} Xeq2=0.4Ω+4.6Ω(8.8)2X_{eq2} = 0.4 \Omega + \frac{4.6 \Omega}{(8.8)^2} Xeq2=0.4Ω+4.6Ω77.44X_{eq2} = 0.4 \Omega + \frac{4.6 \Omega}{77.44} Xeq2≈0.4Ω+0.05939Ω≈0.4594ΩX_{eq2} \approx 0.4 \Omega + 0.05939 \Omega \approx 0.4594 \Omega

Step 5: Calculate the voltage drop at full load
The power factor is 0.8 lagging.

cos⁡ϕ=0.8\cos \phi = 0.8 sin⁡ϕ=1−cos⁡2ϕ=1−(0.8)2=1−0.64=0.36=0.6\sin \phi = \sqrt{1 - \cos^2 \phi} = \sqrt{1 - (0.8)^2} = \sqrt{1 - 0.64} = \sqrt{0.36} = 0.6

The approximate voltage drop (ΔV2\Delta V_2) for a lagging power factor is:

ΔV2=I2,FL(Req2cos⁡ϕ+Xeq2sin⁡ϕ)\Delta V_2 = I_{2, \text{FL}} (R_{eq2} \cos \phi + X_{eq2} \sin \phi) ΔV2=120 A×(0.2168Ω×0.8+0.4594Ω×0.6)\Delta V_2 = 120 \text{ A} \times (0.2168 \Omega \times 0.8 + 0.4594 \Omega \times 0.6) ΔV2=120 A×(0.17344+0.27564)\Delta V_2 = 120 \text{ A} \times (0.17344 + 0.27564) ΔV2=120 A×(0.44908Ω)\Delta V_2 = 120 \text{ A} \times (0.44908 \Omega) ΔV2≈53.89 V\Delta V_2 \approx 53.89 \text{ V}

Step 6: Calculate the secondary voltage at full load
The no-load secondary voltage (V2,NLV_{2, \text{NL}}) when the primary voltage is 2200 V2200 \text{ V} is 250 V250 \text{ V}.
The secondary voltage at full load (V2,FLV_{2, \text{FL}}) is:

Was this helpful?

Still stuck on this one?

Ask a follow-up, and the answer starts from this question.

Got a different question?Ask your own question