Question 1: A concave production possibility curve (PPC) illustrates the law of increasing opportunity cost. This law states that as an economy produces more of one good, it must sacrifice increas

Economics

ScanSolve AI Answer

Answers

6 parts
4

D

C

8

B

A

10

B

11

B

12

B

13

B

Here are the solutions to the Economics multiple-choice questions:

Question 1: A concave production possibility curve (PPC) illustrates the law of increasing opportunity cost. This law states that as an economy produces more of one good, it must sacrifice increasing amounts of the other good. This occurs because resources are not perfectly adaptable or interchangeable between the production of different goods; some resources are better suited for producing one good than another.

  • Option A describes opportunity cost in general, but not specifically increasing opportunity cost.
  • Option B directly explains the reason for increasing opportunity cost and thus the concavity of the PPC.

The final answer is B\boxed{B}

Question 2: In economics, a flow variable is a quantity measured over a period of time (e.g., income per year, consumption per month). A stock variable is measured at a specific point in time (e.g., wealth, capital).

  • Option A correctly defines a flow variable as being measured per unit of time.
  • Options B and D describe characteristics of stock variables or are incorrect.

The final answer is A\boxed{A}

Question 3: The production possibility frontier (PPC) is given by P=100−25QP = 100 - 25Q. To find the opportunity cost of producing one extra unit of P, we need to determine how much Q must be given up for each additional unit of P.
Rearrange the equation to solve for Q:
25Q=100−P25Q = 100 - P
Q=10025−125PQ = \frac{100}{25} - \frac{1}{25}P
Q=4−125PQ = 4 - \frac{1}{25}P
The coefficient of P, which is −125-\frac{1}{25}, represents the change in Q for a one-unit change in P. Therefore, producing one extra unit of P requires giving up 125\frac{1}{25} units of Q.

The final answer is B\boxed{B}

Question 4: Indifference curves show combinations of goods that yield the same level of utility to a consumer.

  • Perfect substitutes are goods that a consumer is willing to trade at a constant rate, resulting in straight-line indifference curves.
  • Perfect complements are goods consumed in fixed proportions, leading to L-shaped indifference curves.
  • Most goods have convex indifference curves, indicating a diminishing marginal rate of substitution. The diagram shows parallel straight-line indifference curves, which is characteristic of perfect substitutes.

The final answer is D\boxed{D}

Question 5: Consumer equilibrium in indifference curve analysis is achieved at the point where the budget line is tangent to the highest possible indifference curve. At this point, the slope of the indifference curve (Marginal Rate of Substitution, MRS) is equal to the slope of the budget line (the ratio of prices).
So, MRS=P1P2MRS = \frac{P_1}{P_2}.
The MRS is also equal to the ratio of marginal utilities: MRS=MU1MU2MRS = \frac{MU_1}{MU_2}.
Therefore, MU1MU2=P1P2\frac{MU_1}{MU_2} = \frac{P_1}{P_2}, which can be rearranged to MU1P1=MU2P2\frac{MU_1}{P_1} = \frac{MU_2}{P_2}. Both options B and D are equivalent and correct statements of consumer equilibrium. However, option D directly states the tangency condition in terms of MRS and price ratio, which is a direct interpretation from indifference curve analysis.

The final answer is D\boxed{D}

Question 6: A monopolist adopting a marginal cost pricing policy aims to set the price equal to the marginal cost (P=MCP = MC). In a monopoly diagram, the price is given by the Average Revenue (AR) curve. Therefore, we look for the output level where the AR curve intersects the MC curve.
In the given diagram, the intersection of the AR curve and the MC curve occurs at output level D.

The final answer is D\boxed{D}

Question 7: The optimum combination of factors of production (labour and capital) for a firm occurs when the firm allocates its spending such that the last dollar spent on each factor yields the same marginal product. This is known as the equi-marginal principle for factor combination.
Mathematically, this is expressed as:

MPLPL=MPKPK\frac{MP_L}{P_L} = \frac{MP_K}{P_K}

where MPLMP_L and MPKMP_K are the marginal products of labour and capital, and PLP_L and PKP_K are their respective prices.
Option C directly states this principle. Option D is its reciprocal, which is also correct but C is the more standard form.

The final answer is C\boxed{C}

Question 8: On a total cost curve (with total cost on the y-axis and quantity on the x-axis):

  • The average total cost (ATC) for a given quantity is calculated as Total CostQuantity\frac{\text{Total Cost}}{\text{Quantity}}. Graphically, this is represented by the slope of a ray (a straight line) drawn from the origin to the corresponding point on the total cost curve.
  • The marginal cost (MC) is the slope of the total cost curve (the slope of the tangent to the curve at a given point).

Therefore, option B correctly describes how average total cost is calculated graphically.

The final answer is B\boxed{B}

Question 9: To determine if costs can be reduced by reallocating inputs, we need to compare the marginal product per dollar for each factor. The firm is at an optimum when the marginal product per dollar is equal for all factors.

  • For Land: MPLandPLand=10200=0.05\frac{MP_{Land}}{P_{Land}} = \frac{10}{200} = 0.05 units of output per dollar.
  • For Labour: MPLabourPLabour=5100=0.05\frac{MP_{Labour}}{P_{Labour}} = \frac{5}{100} = 0.05 units of output per dollar.
  • For Capital: MPCapitalPCapital=240=0.05\frac{MP_{Capital}}{P_{Capital}} = \frac{2}{40} = 0.05 units of output per dollar. Since the marginal product per dollar is equal for all three factors, the firm is already using the optimum combination of inputs. Therefore, it is not possible to reduce costs by reallocating inputs while maintaining the same output level.

The final answer is A\boxed{A}

Question 10: When a specific tax is imposed on a good, the supply curve shifts vertically upwards by the amount of the tax.
In the diagram:

  • S is the original supply curve.
  • S' is the new supply curve after the tax.
  • The new equilibrium quantity is Q2Q_2.
  • At Q2Q_2, point Y is on the new supply curve S' (representing the price consumers pay).
  • At Q2Q_2, point X is on the original supply curve S (representing the price producers receive). The vertical distance between the new supply curve (S') and the original supply curve (S) at any given quantity represents the per-unit tax. Therefore, the tax per unit is the vertical distance XY.

The final answer is B\boxed{B}

Question 11: For a consumer to be in equilibrium, the marginal utility per dollar spent on each good must be equal. This is the equi-marginal principle:

MUFoodPFood=MUClothingPClothing\frac{MU_{Food}}{P_{Food}} = \frac{MU_{Clothing}}{P_{Clothing}}

Given:

  • MUFood=10MU_{Food} = 10 utils
  • PFood=P_{Food} = 5
  • PClothing=P_{Clothing} = 0.50 First, calculate the marginal utility per dollar for food:
MUFoodPFood=10 utils5 dollars=2 utils per dollar\frac{MU_{Food}}{P_{Food}} = \frac{10 \text{ utils}}{5 \text{ dollars}} = 2 \text{ utils per dollar}

At equilibrium, the marginal utility per dollar for clothing must also be 2 utils per dollar:

MUClothingPClothing=2 utils per dollar\frac{MU_{Clothing}}{P_{Clothing}} = 2 \text{ utils per dollar} MUClothing=2 utils per dollar×PClothing=2×0.50=1 utilMU_{Clothing} = 2 \text{ utils per dollar} \times P_{Clothing} = 2 \times 0.50 = 1 \text{ util}

The final answer is B\boxed{B}

Question 12: The total cost function is C=10000+100Q2C = 10000 + 100Q^2.
Average Total Cost (ATC) is calculated as Total CostQuantity\frac{\text{Total Cost}}{\text{Quantity}}.
Given Q=20Q = 20 units.
First, calculate the total cost at Q=20Q=20:

C=10000+100(20)2=10000+100(400)=10000+40000=50000C = 10000 + 100(20)^2 = 10000 + 100(400) = 10000 + 40000 = 50000

Now, calculate the average total cost:

ATC=CQ=5000020=2500ATC = \frac{C}{Q} = \frac{50000}{20} = 2500

The final answer is B\boxed{B}

Question 13: Let QHQ_H be the quantity of health care and QSQ_S be the quantity of shelter.
The consumer consumes in a constant proportion: QH:QS=1:2Q_H : Q_S = 1 : 2, so QS=2QHQ_S = 2Q_H.
Prices are PH=P_H = 20 and PS=P_S = 15.
The budget constraint is PHQH+PSQS=IncomeP_H Q_H + P_S Q_S = \text{Income}.
With the new income of $3000:

20QH+15QS=300020 Q_H + 15 Q_S = 3000

Substitute QS=2QHQ_S = 2Q_H:

20QH+15(2QH)=300020 Q_H + 15 (2Q_H) = 3000 20QH+30QH=300020 Q_H + 30 Q_H = 3000 50QH=300050 Q_H = 3000 QH=300050=60 unitsQ_H = \frac{3000}{50} = 60 \text{ units}

Then, QS=2QH=2(60)=120 unitsQ_S = 2Q_H = 2(60) = 120 \text{ units}.
The new quantities are 60 units of health care and 120 units of shelter.

The final answer is B\boxed{B}

Was this helpful?

Try one yourself

A new problem that tests the same skill.

Still stuck on this one?

Ask a follow-up, and the answer starts from this question.

Got a different question?Ask your own question