This psychology problem is solved step by step below, with detailed explanations to help you understand the method and arrive at the correct answer.
ScanSolve AI Answer
The error Dr. Howard has made is Over-generalisation. Here's why: Over-generalisation occurs when a researcher draws a conclusion about a larger population based on observations from a limited sample. Dr. Howard observed 95 people in his neighbourhood sample and then concluded that all patients* contracted HIV/Aids in the same way. This extends the findings from a specific group to a broader, unspecified population without sufficient evidence. The other options are incorrect: Selective observation would mean he only paid attention to cases that fit his hypothesis, ignoring others. The problem doesn't suggest this. Illogical reasoning is a broader category, but "over-generalisation" is the specific type of logical fallacy committed here. Inaccurate observation would mean his data about the 95 people was wrong, which is not stated in the problem. The correct option is Over-generalisation. Last free one today — make it count tomorrow, or type /upgrade for unlimited.